# 📝 Digital Signature Market Outlook

### E-signature vs. Digital Signature

Regularly the terms e-signature and digital signature are used interchangeably, but each has different features that make the distinction between the two.&#x20;

**“Electronic signature,** or **e-signature,** refers to [data](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data) in electronic form, which is logically associated with other data in electronic form and which is used by the [signatory](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signature) to sign. This type of signature provides the same legal standing as a handwritten signature as long as it adheres to the requirements of the specific regulation it was created under (e.g., [eIDAS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EIDAS) in the [European Union](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union), [NIST-DSS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Signature_Algorithm) in the [USA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States) or [ZertES](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZertES) in [Switzerland](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Switzerland)).**”**<br>

**“A digital signature** guarantees the authenticity of an electronic document or message in digital communication and uses encryption techniques to provide proof of originality.**"**

![](https://3955826681-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-legacy-files/o/assets%2F-MlPqmjsMbWNiGpc5ylY%2F-MlVrNTbXvg4OGxQuPk_%2F-MlVw9G5ILZRUqC41Ybn%2Fesignature_vs_digital.png?alt=media\&token=a4116abb-ba9a-4018-bee4-1183bb477264)

### Law Standards for e-Signature

There are different laws accepted in countries worldwide regarding the use of e-signatures. The major difference in laws and how e-signatures are treated and accepted are laws implemented in the U.S. and in Europe. Regarding which territory we’re targeting as our initial user base, those laws need to be our focus and fully compliant with the implementation of e-signatures and digital signatures in our solution. Here is a short [list](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_signature#Laws_regarding_their_use) of laws regulated in different countries: <br>

* **Australia -** [**Electronic Transactions Act 1999**](http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2011C00445) **(which incorporates amendments from Electronic Transactions Amendment Act 2011),** [**Section 10 - Signatures**](http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2011C00445/Html/Text#_Toc296406959) **specifically relates to electronic signatures.**
* **Canada -** [**PIPEDA**](http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/P-8.6/index.html)**,** [**its regulations**](http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2005-30/?showtoc=\&instrumentnumber=SOR-2005-30)**, and the** [**Canada Evidence Act**](http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-5/)**.**
* **China - Law of the People’s Republic of China on Electronic Signature (effective April 1, 2005)**
* **European Union -** [**eIDAS**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EIDAS) **regulation on implementation within the EU is set out in the** [**Digital Signatures and the Law**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signatures_and_law#European_Union_and_the_European_Economic_Area)**.**
* **India -** [**Information Technology Act**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Technology_Act)
* **Ireland -** [**Electronic Commerce Act 2000**](http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/2000/en/act/pub/0027/index.html)
* **Japan -** [**Law Concerning Electronic Signatures and Certification Services, 2000**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signatures_and_law#Japan)
* **Russian Federation -** [**Federal Law of Russian Federation about Electronic Signature (06.04.2011)**](http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=\&nd=102146610)
* **Switzerland -** [**ZertES**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZertES)
* **UK - s.7** [**Electronic Communications Act 2000**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Communications_Act_2000)
* **U.S. -** [**Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Signatures_in_Global_and_National_Commerce_Act)**;** [**Uniform Electronic Transactions Act**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Electronic_Transactions_Act) **- adopted by 48 states;**  [**Digital Signature And Electronic Authentication Law**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Signature_And_Electronic_Authentication_Law)**;**  [**Government Paperwork Elimination Act**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Paperwork_Elimination_Act) **(GPEA) and** [**The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Commercial_Code)

E-signatures can be created with high levels of security, with each having its own set of requirements and means of creation on different levels that prove the validity of the signature. To provide an even stronger [probative value](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevance_\(law\)) than the above described advanced electronic signature, some countries like the European Union or Switzerland introduced the qualified electronic signature. It is very challenging to undermine the authorship of a statement signed with a [qualified electronic signature](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_electronic_signature). This type of statement is [non-reputable](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-repudiation).[\[8\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_signature#cite_note-Turner-Understanding-eIDAS-8) Technically, a **qualified electronic signature** is implemented through an advanced electronic signature that utilises a digital certificate, which has been encrypted through a security signature-creating device  and which has been authenticated by a [qualified trust service provider](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_electronic_signature#Qualified_Trust_Service_Providers). <br>

The European Union has introduced a list of qualified TSP’s (Trust Service Providers) which provide signing with qualified electronic signatures. So major players in this market that target the EU audience with e-signing services have to offer e-signature methods from these providers. <br>
